Print View
March 22, 2010 - Supplemental Budget Bill S.F. 3223 Bill Check


Senate Majority Research

 

Comparison of Senate and Governor's Supplemental Budget Bills

 

Article 2 – Higher Education

 

University of Minnesota                                     2010-11                       2012-13

Governor’s Proposal                                        ($36.12 million)          ($172.24 million)         

Senate’s Bill                                                   ($36.12 million)          ($46.558 million)

 

These reductions will cut the U of M’s state funding level to their 2001 level.  The funding is taken from the U of M’s operations fund.  The legislation allows the U of M to decide the best way to absorb the reductions.  The Senate’s budget does not include the Governor’s ongoing unallotments in 2012-13 ($100 million).

 

MnSCU                                                               2010-11                       2012-13

Governor’s Proposal                                       ($10.467 million)        ($120.934 million)        

Senate’s Bill                                                  ($10.467 million)         ($46.586 million)


The Senate’s and Governor’s proposals both reduce MnSCU’s funding by $10.467 million.  These cuts reduce MnSCU’s state funding to their 2002 level.

 

The Senate reduces the Central Office funding by $43.749 million, while increasing the operations and maintenance budget by $33.282 million for 2010-11.  This is done to give MnSCU more flexibility with their cuts by not having the Central Office funding as a separate line item (the Central Office will still receive funding).

 

The Senate’s budget does not include the Governor’s ongoing unallotments in 2012-13 ($100 million).

 

Office of Higher Education (OHE) Governor Senate
Administration 2010-11 ($141,000) ($141,000)
2012-13 ($162,000) ($162,000)
Fiscal Policy and Research (OHE) 2012-13 ($154,000) $0
Student & Parent Information Program 2010-11 ($9,000) $0
2012-13 ($6,000) $0
Get Ready Outreach Program 2010-11 ($6,000) $0
2012-13 ($12,000) $0
MMEP 2010-11 ($3,000) $0
2012-13 ($6,000) $0
Financial Aid
Eliminate Summer Grant 2010-11 ($4.876 million) $0
2012-13 ($4.8 million) $0
Eliminate 9th Semester 2010-11 ($4 million) $0
2012-13 ($8 million) $0
Child Care Assistance Grants 2010-11 ($500,000) $0
2012-13 ($1 million) $0
Work Study 2010-11 ($2.5 million) ($2.303 million)
2012-13 ($5 million) ($4.606 million)
 
American Indian Scholarships 2010-11 $0 $0
2012-13 ($240,000) $0
Technical and Community 2010-11 ($150,000) ($150,000)
College Emergency Grants
Other Programs
ICAP 2010-11 ($65,000) $0
2012-13 ($86,000) $0
Midwest Higher Education Compact 2010-11 ($6,000) $0
2012-13 ($6,000) $0
United Family Practice 2010-11 ($41,000) ($41,000)
2012-13 ($56,000) ($56,000)
MN College Savings Program 2010-11 ($72,000) ($72,000)
2012-13 ($100,000) ($100,000)
MINITEX Library Services/MnLINK 2010-11 ($457,000) ($457,000)
2012-13 ($724,000) ($724,000)

 

Achieve Grants

Both the Senate and the Governor’s proposals transfer federal Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP) program and Special Leveraging Educational Assistance Program (SLEAP) funding ($2.66 million in 2011 and $2.66 million in 2012-13) to the Achieve scholarship program.

 

State Grant Program

There is a deficiency in the State Grant Program due to the increased number of students.  To make up for the deficiency, the Senate is proposing to ration the grants.  The Senate’s proposal:

 

·         Keeps the 9th semester and summer transition grants (Governor cuts those);

 

·         Increases the Assigned Student Responsibility by 2.25% (from 46% to 48.25%); and

 

·         Creates a 20.5% Assigned Family Responsibility Surcharge.

 

Controversial?  The Higher Education section of this bill should not be controversial.  Though we would like to make zero cuts to this area, higher education fares very well compared to other budgets because of maintenance of effort.  Because the state used federal stimulus funding, higher education can only be cut to its 2006 funding levels. 

 

 Read the full budget comparison